The penny only recently dropped for me on that — after some 50 years of trying to make a living partially on the strength of my ability to write about why I promoted certain forms of action. I called myself an organizer who writes.
Let me save you from my 50 years of learning the hard way.
Like most people who are anxious and fearful about writing, I used to think that writing had to be clever in its own right. I imagined that people would only enjoy and read my writing if I met a certain quota of wordplay or entertainment.
I didn’t understand that non-fiction readers of articles about everyday life want someone to explain a problem to them, outline some possible solutions, and present some thoughts on how we might get to the promised land of solutions. The clearer, the better. The sooner, the better. No suspense, no diversions asked for or needed.
As simple as possible, but no simpler — as Einstein brilliantly put it.
As soon (50 years later!!) as I grasped that, I quickly settled into a sense of ease as a writer. The quality of my writing took a huge leap. And people started asking me how come I got to write so easily and quickly.
Like other overnight successes, it was only 50 years in the making.
A few months ago, I read a book that caused the penny to drop, and then led me to write this editorial. It’s Jim Edwards’ book called Copywriting Secrets. I read 74 pages in one sitting, and then stopped abruptly. His writing is really mediocre, I said to myself. And then the penny dropped.
His secret about copywriting, like my deep secret about email subject lines, is based on a strategy. You need to understand the problem faced by your readers, the obstacles and frustration faced by your readers as a result of the problem, and the measures that the reader can be persuaded to take that will lead toward a solution.
Once you figure that out, you can be as boring as you want.
This is a tough nut to crack for people in Good Food movements and organizations. We’re used to being empathic about other people, working to solve the problems of other people. We’re not particularly empathic about ourselves. When we ask for money, we don’t ask for money so our organizations can function better and smarter and we don’t have to work 60-hour weeks. We ask for more money so we can serve others more.
Anything less would be considered self-serving, which is –shall I say it? – sinful.
We have to break that habit. Because the essence of a good email, and of a good email subject line that leads people to read the email, is that it solves a problem that you otherwise didn’t know how to solve. That’s the insight we need to gain in order to increase our relevance and our ability to serve.
Once you accept that, the rest is technical details and skills. The same insight will also help you with headlines. And with the leads to your stories and with your elevator pitches and speeches. As my communications mentor Barry Martin puts it, the insight is generative.
I hope the eight helpings below provide you with the technical details and mindful skills that go along with this trade secret.
|